Supreme Court's strict order on Baba's bulldozer! If there is only one accused, then why punish the whole family?

The Supreme Court on Wednesday gave a big verdict on bulldozer justice. The Supreme Court has declared demolition of people's houses with bulldozers as unconstitutional. The court said that if the executive demolishes a person's house merely on the ground that he is an accused, it is a violation of the rule of law. The Supreme Court said that even against those accused and convicted of serious crimes, bulldozer action cannot be taken without following the rules. The court said that the rule of law, rights of citizens and the principle of natural justice are essential conditions. If a property is demolished merely because a person has been accused then it is completely unconstitutional. The accused cannot punish the entire family for the mistake of one person. Why should the entire family be punished? Compensation should be given for wrongly demolishing a house. Misuse of power cannot be tolerated. Bulldozer action cannot be partisan. Officials will not be spared for the arbitrariness of the bulldozer. It is the job of the court to give punishment for any crime. No one should be considered guilty without a verdict. Send the notice by registered post, 15 days time. What did the Supreme Court say? The bench of Supreme Court comprising BR Gavai and Justice KV Vishwanathan announced its verdict. In his decision, Justice Gavai said that someone's home is his hope. It is everyone's dream that his shelter should never be taken away. . Every person hopes to have shelter. The question before us is whether the executive can take away the asylum of a person who is accused of a crime. The court said that the house of an accused cannot be demolished just because he is accused of any crime. He said that only the judiciary will decide the truth in the allegations. Supreme Court's strict order on Baba's bulldozer! If there is only one accused, then why punish the whole family?