Fight over bulldozing action at Noori Masjid in Uttar Pradesh's Fatehpur before December 13
A few weeks ago, the Supreme Court had issued guidelines regarding some bulldozer actions and said that action will be taken against the officer who violates them. In such a situation, the Fatehpur district administration is being accused of violating the guidelines of the Supreme Court.
Clashes have erupted over the bulldozing action on Noori Masjid in Uttar Pradesh's Fatehpur ahead of December 13. The mosque committee says that the district administration has defied the court as the matter is still in court. At the same time, the district administration says that the court did not stay or stop the bulldozer action, so the action was taken. The district administration has also been accused of ignoring the Supreme Court's guidelines that 15 days notice is required before bulldozing action. Let's see what both sides have to say in their arguments.The mosque committee claims that the Noori Masjid is about 180 years old. He says that the mosque was built in 1839. The mosque committee says that when the mosque was built, there was no road here but there was a forest, so the talk of illegal construction is wrong. The committee also says that the mosque has been deliberately targeted, as it was also advised to build a bypass to save it, but that was not considered. The mosque committee said that the matter was heard in the Allahabad High Court on December 13, so the action on the mosque is completely wrong. On the allegations of ignoring the guidelines of the Supreme Court, the district administration says that the notice was issued to the mosque 45 days before the bulldozer action. The administration also said that the court had not stayed the case, so the action is not wrong from anywhere. A few weeks ago, the Supreme Court had issued guidelines regarding some bulldozer actions and said that action will be taken against the officer who violates them. In such a situation, the Fatehpur district administration is being accused of violating the guidelines of the Supreme Court.
What's Your Reaction?